The M+G+R Foundation
The purpose of this Private Forum is to share with
members of our Mailing List the response to and/or
comment of correspondence
that we may receive from time to time and which is of Universal
in these very unsettling times. Each List Member, may, at his/her
discretion, share this page with others.
We reserve the right to choose
questions to address and how to
transcribe the question and/or statement from the correspondence
The identity of the correspondent will be kept confidential except in
case of abusive correspondence which will then be referred to the
From (Mrs.) MMcK @ USA -
Published on September 29th, 2009 [Feast
of Sts. Michael, Gabriel and Raphael Archangels]
I was out driving today and
saw a man swatting at a wasp in his car.
I was reminded of a Superman comic book that I read when I was a
kid. In it Superman was on trial and was asked if he had
ever killed before. He replied that he had not and they showed
him swatting a fly and asked if he had killed that fly and he
said yes, so he had killed and he had lied. He was
sentenced to die.
Why is this significant? The fellow who was swatting at the wasp
was using his bible to kill it. Where is it written that
Thou shalt not kill? Does it say another human being?
It just says Thou shalt not kill.
I just thought it was kind of ironic that a bible was being used to
kill and wanted to share this with you.
A. That seemingly innocuous
observation contains enough leaven to treat much more than three
measures of meal. [Matthew
Even before his conversion -
at least since his teens - miguel de Portugal felt very strongly
that to hunt an animal strictly for the sport of it was very wrong.
After his conversion - as many other changes were taking (and continue
to take) place - the killing of any creature seemed wrong more and more
to the point where even roaches, bees, wasps and flies, for example,
allowed to return to the (or placed back) outdoors without causing them
any harm; whenever an insect, like ants, are noticed upon his path
while outdoors, he will avoid stepping on them, without it becoming an obsession. He has come to see all
of them as integral (not by-products) parts of God's Creation and
should be treated as such.
Your letter took miguel's mind-set to another level since specific
readings immediately came to mind:
23 My elect shall not labour in vain, nor
bring forth in trouble; for they are the seed of the blessed of the
Lord, and their posterity with them. 24 And it shall come to pass, that
before they call, I will hear; as they are yet speaking, I will hear.
25 The wolf and the lamb shall feed together; the lion and the ox shall
eat straw; and dust shall be the serpent's food: they shall not hurt
nor kill in all my holy mountain, saith the Lord. [Isaiah 65]
6 The wolf shall dwell with the lamb: and
the leopard shall lie down with the kid: the calf and the lion, and the
sheep shall abide together, and a little child shall lead them. 7 The
calf and the bear shall feed: their young ones shall rest together: and
the lion shall eat straw like the ox. 8 And the sucking child shall
play on the hole of the asp: and the weaned child shall thrust his hand
into the den of the basilisk. 9 They shall not hurt, nor shall they
kill in all my holy mountain, for the earth is filled with the
knowledge of the Lord, as the covering waters of the sea. [Isaiah
1 And God blessed Noe and his sons. And he
said to them: Increase and multiply, and fill the earth. 2 And let the
fear and dread of you be upon all the beasts of the earth, and upon all
the fowls of the air, and all that move upon the earth: all the fishes
of the sea are delivered into your hand. 3 And every thing that moveth
and liveth shall be meat for you: even as the green herbs have I
delivered them all to you: 4 Saving that flesh with blood you shall not
eat. 5 For I will require the blood of your lives at the hand of every
beast, and at the hand of man, at the hand of every man, and of his
brother, will I require the life of man. [Genesis 9]
As we said.... your seemingly
innocuous observation contains enough leaven to treat far more than
three measures of meal. [Matthew
How many measures?
It will vary depending on the point of the journey of each individual
From (Mr.) WO @ USA -
on September 25th, 2009
May Christ bless you!
In reference to your document of (1), among other things,
me is that we need to be very careful when we recite the words of the
Creed - Apostle's or that of the Council of Nicea. If I am in any way
wrong in what I say here, please do correct me!
Specifically the phrase:" ....and I believe in one, holy,
and Apostolic church (Nicene) or 'the holy Catholic church'
(Apostle's)". I think that one must be very careful in uttering or
mentally praying this. One must understand this as being "catholic"
(lower case 'c', meaning the one universal church founded by Jesus
& loyal to Him)....... NOT as "Catholic" (upper case "C") meaning
the man-made organization run amuck, heaquartered in the Vatican -
complete with its EENS so-called 'dogma". To understand and believe
what we are praying here in these phrases as belief in the Faith........
not "the "Church". These phrases, drilled into our heads since
childhood are spiritual/theological "tiger traps"!
On a related point (and I am NOT a Latin or Greek scholar!) in a
TV presentation given by some Protestant minister, the point was made
that the word "church" did not exist in the time of Christ; but the
Latin word "ecclesia" (and its Greek root) did. There would seem to be
a big difference between the two words/concepts. "Church" has its roots
in German & Scandinavian languages (
i.e. kirk, kirche = church)...... which refers to both a physical
building and to an "assembly"; which is the common understanding of the
term in reference to a group/organization. On the other hand
":Ecclesia" (the word uttered by Christ) in its Greek root means
something completely different. My understanding is that it means
"out-calling" or "ones called out....... selected". "It is not too much
of a stretch to see how this can be perceived to mean, by extension,
Therefore, if what I understand is correct (and explained properly
here) this serves to reinforce what you have said about "the Rock" and
the rest of the words which Our Lord spoke to Peter........ which have
been misappropriated to refer to the Vatican. There is a big difference
between what we call "the church" being the ones "called out from among
men by God"........ and "an
assembly....... building........ organization...... hiearchial
structure....... multi-billion dollar/multinational money machine". Of
course if you look in a dictionary you will find that "ecclesia" (and
all of its grammatical offshoots) are claimed now to refer to "church".
How utterly diabolical!
You remain in my daily prayers.
A. Thank you for the
opportunity to address this issue as well as for your prayers. We are
neither Latin nor Greek scholars but - in general terms - we agree with
your "church" word analysis.
Now - to the point. We have not prayed the Nicean Creed for some time
because, as we may have written years ago, it is theologically
incorrect. It denies the Trinity. On the other hand, the Apostles
Creed is essentially flawless and that is the Creed we pray with only
one small change.
Where it reads "I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church,
the communion of saints...." we have changed it to "I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Faith (2), the communion of saints....".
Today's common usage dictates that when we say "Catholic Church" it
basically means the "Roman Catholic Church Administration" and in them
we certainly do not believe as we have made crystal clear. (3)
(1) The Once and
Future Christendom - A review and commentary
full endorsement of the key and basic tenets of the Catholic Faith
Position about the Roman Catholic Church Administration - Part I and
@ US - Published
on September 22nd, 2009
See what you think of this page (1).
I ran across it and watched the 1st video. I don't know.... it
seems so hard to believe but.... if we do not take the vaccination,
will we be jailed?
As we have stated - Step No. 17 (2)
will be reached sooner than later. That means that "their" options are
all open, but as so are God's....
At this point we continue to receive information from totally
disconnected physical sources which confirm all that we have, and
forecast - including the bogus pandemic.
Now - Regarding the particular page you mention (1): A red Flag is always
raised when we see "business opportunities" associated with the
"doomsday" predictions. As you will see on the left of the page - in a
very visible spot - there is a sign for "Buy Gold Before Its Too Late" (3).
We have obviously known that gold was to rise to unheard of levels
since 1991 yet no one has seen us promoting, much less
selling gold. [By the way - if we had engaged in such gold trading and
hoarding back then, we would have made the proverbial killing and would
not have been depending on donations to fulfill the Will of God but, as
He admonished us all [Matthew
6:24] - miguel de Portugal could not simultaneously
serve God and Mammon. (4)]
We do use the Gold Price Index as a "State of Affairs" Index but not
as a recommendation to buy or sell.
As we have said before - there is precious little mankind can do now
besides to pray (5),
spread the factual information published to awaken those who are
still asleep, and plan for the future as we have highlighted in the
past (6) to
which we now have to add to consuming and stockpiling of vitamin D-3 as
others, have done according to
a previous correspondence.
@ US - Published
on September 18th, 2009
Recently I have had some insights on my behavior and I want to admit
them to you.
There have been a few times when I have altered documents that belongs
to The M+G+R Foundation and then shared those with others.
Although I did not change the words, I did highlight certain sections
to call out a point that I wanted to make. I did that by changing
the color and font of the text.
Also, I now recognize that in so many of my personal e-mails and
conversations, meetings, etc. I appropriated The M+G+R Foundation
ideas, phrases and wordings and used them without acknowledging their
source and to express my personal interpretation of what they
meant. I mentioned that I did this in my meetings with the
Jehovah Witnesses, but I did not say that I did it many more times and
in other instances.
I do now see your very many efforts to get me to admit what I was doing
and to understand that it was wrong. At the time, I could not or
would not see what it was and the points you were trying to make.
Also, I had rationalized with myself that I was only changing the color
for emphasis. But the truth is that it was just disobedience.
I understand how wrong that was, and that it was arrogant of me to
change what I believed God delivered and you published, and to use it
to urge my beliefs on other people. It was wrong of me not to ask
for permission, as your documents state clearly. And it would
have been honest of me in those cases to share what I wanted to write,
or to have shown it to you.
I am very sorry for having done this and I apologize.
If there is anything that I can do to repair for what I have done at
this time, please let me know.
Thank you for all the prayers and help.
A. Your admission of
wrongdoing, of course, Glorifies God above all; it also indicates
good progress in your journey Home. The closer we get to God - the
the easier it is for us to see what is wrong in us and with our
behavior, wrongs which we could not see before because we did not have
enough light then.
Let us take one item of your letter at a time.
Highlighting: As long
as it is indicated that it is the individual's highlighting and not the
issuer of the document, letter, etc. - there is no problem whatsoever
with that. We, ourselves, try to indicate that is not
from the original source whatever
we quote or
forward when the highlighting, underscoring, italicizing, etc..
of documents or utilizing theological concepts without credit:
Whatever we reveal is from God and whatever is from God is free and
freely we must give it. The problem arises when the individual implies
- overtly or covertly - that the information was delivered to him/her
For example - If you explained in your own words the Secret Concept of
the Most Holy Trinity and pass yourself as the vehicle through which
God made that know to mankind, you would have a problem - not with us,
but with God.
paraphrasing what one reads and learn there is greater latitude. One
can say: "I read that m
de P says 'this and that'; the way I interpret that is 'thus and
such'". This is not a problem since everyone is entitled to his/her own
opinion and views.
The main point is: Deceit is never ever from God, regardless of the
example the Vatican has given for a good 1,600 years. Then, if it is
not from God.... where is it from?
All Christian must strive at all times
not to deceive anyone - we must remember that the most powerful
Evangelization tool is the example we give others.
You state/ask: If there is anything that I can do to
repair for what I have done at this time, please let me know.
The answer is: Strive for the Light of God with all your soul
and heart - at all times.
In closing we shall quote Wisdom Himself - the Word of God, Jesus
Neither will I condemn thee. Go, and now
sin no more. Again therefore, Jesus spoke to them, saying: I am the
light of the world: he that followeth me, walketh not in darkness, but
shall have the light of life. [John 8:11-12]
@ Canada - Published
on September 15th, 2009 [Feast of Our Lady of Sorrows
I would like to have
your insight about what to believe concerning Bayside
I've read your comments given on December 15, 2005.
I must say I've always felt a bit
awkward when visiting that web site
as opposed to other revelations given by our Lady.
Tonight I'm even more troubled
regarding the position that the church
has taken towards these particular apparitions and the specific
denunciation that Bishop Mugavero has expressly written concerning the
imposture of Pope Paul VI.
How does a good Christian obey to
this? Do we obey the church?
the Bayside apparitions - we have nothing else to add to what we have
already said except that it simply "does not feel right" thus it is
best to avoid it.
Other key apparitions approved (1) and still pending (2) have more than enough
correct and coherent information, thus we recommend to avoid pursuing
those which "just do not feel right".
Regarding the letter
allegedly written by Bishop Mugavero (3) - it is a quote by EWTN
from "Cults, Sects, and the New Age," Rev. James J. LeBar (OSV Press).
We cannot consider either source reliable. EWTN from ample personal
experience; and the other one, by default.
Which brings us to your
central question: How does a
Christian obey to this? Do we obey the church?
As we have done in the past, we go to
the ultimate source - the Holy
Scriptures to back up what we have to say. The answer was already given
by Peter and the other
Apostles when they addressed the high priest, and they that were
with him, the council, and all the ancients of the children of Israel
thus [Acts 5]: We ought to obey God,
rather than men. [Acts 5:
Regardless of the preposterous claims
made by the Papacy for centuries,
and without taking away the legitimate position and function of the
Bishop of Rome (4) -
no man takes the place
of God and the teachings of even the highest representative of any
Faith cannot, under any
circumstance, supersede what God has taught
us through the Holy Scriptures.
The "Church" or any
religious institution representing any faith has only one
function: Facilitate, and help maintain, a constructive link between an
individual and God. The moment they start trying to supersede the Word
of God they can be categorized into one of two categories: The camp of
Anti Christ forerunners or the camp if the False Christ forerunners.
Blessedly - the fundamental
teachings of God via the Holy Scriptures,
specifically of Jesus Christ, are so crystal clear that they do not
need interpretation. The interpretation starts when man wants to adjust
the Word of God to advance his very worldly needs.
What did Jesus tell Peter -
the original one! -
when he was
trying to prevent Jesus from going to Jerusalem?
Get behind me, Satan, thou art a scandal
unto me: because thou savourest not the things that are of God, but the
things that are of men. [Matthew
Shortly after receiving your
letter, God "dropped on our lap" a very
current example (5) of
continuing conflicting signals that
come to the faithful from the highest levels of the Vatican. It was as
if He was saying: "In case you need a fresh example, here is one!"
Teilhard de Chardin's theology was also viewed with caution
by officials both of
the Jesuit order and in the Vatican. Among other things, officials
worried that his optimistic reading of nature compromised church
teaching on original sin. In 1962 -- seven years after his death -- the
Vatican's doctrinal office issued a warning that his works "abound in
such ambiguities and indeed even serious errors, as to offend Catholic
1981, on the 100th anniversary of Teilhard's birth, speculation erupted
about a possible rehabilitation. It was fueled by a letter published in
L'Osservatore Romano, the Vatican newspaper, by the then-Cardinal
Secretary of State Agostino Casaroli, who praised the "astonishing
resonance of his research, as well as the brilliance of his personality
and richness of his thinking." Casaroli asserted that Teilhard had
anticipated John Paul II's call to "be not afraid," embracing "culture,
civilization and progress."
to ferment created by the
letter, the Vatican issued a statement insisting that its 1962 verdict
on Teilhard still stands -- to date, Rome's last official pronouncement
on Teilhard. (The statement was issued in July 1981, four months before
Ratzinger, the future Pope Benedict XVI, took over
as prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.)
Teilhard de Chardin was
priest, scientist and philosopher .]
forward in time.....
There you have it! Is
Teilhard "approved" or not? Are his teachings approved or not? All we
know is that the
enough reason to be confused and it behooves them to place their full
trust in God and His Word (6).
really is that simple!
Benedict's brief of July 24
(2009) in reference to Teilhard, praising his vision of the entire
as a "living host," can be read on multiple levels -- as part of the
pontiff's rapprochement with the Jesuits, or as a further instance of
finding something positive to say about thinkers whose works have set
off doctrinal alarms, as Benedict previously did with rebel Swiss
theologian and former colleague Hans Küng.
Toward the end of a reflection upon
the Letter to the Romans, in which St. Paul writes that the world
itself will one day become a form of living worship, the pope said,
"It's the great vision that later Teilhard de Chardin also had: At the
end we will have a true cosmic liturgy, where the cosmos becomes a
living host. "Let's pray to the Lord that he
us be priests in this sense," the pope said, "to help in the
transformation of the world in adoration of God, beginning with
Thank you M-A for the
opportunity to address this issue one more time,
albeit from a different angle.
(2) Rosa Mystica, Garabandal
(3) EWTN Publication
XVI cites Teilhardian vision of the cosmos as a 'living host'
Faith is God
@ US - Published
on September 12th, 2009 [Holy Name of Mary
With regard to your posting of
the 3rd (1), one
can easily see the dismembering of the Roman Catholic Church as nearly
It can also be seen that the Orthodox Churches will be the catacombs of
A. That is correct
to a certain extent since each Orthodox Patriarchate is independent
from each other (2) - as it was from the beginning - and it is only
loosely connected through the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Istanbul
even though the Ecumenical Patriarch (3) was informed years ago
as to what was taking place, he seems to have "fallen for" Benedict
However, this should have little effect
on the purity of many of the very independent Patriarchates.
We are quite
confident that most of the Eucharist being offered in the
Orthodox Churches as well as the Eastern Rite Roman Catholic Churches
worldwide is indeed the Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ.
Unfortunatelyy, we do not have the same confidence level regarding the
traditional Roman Catholic Churches. We are still searching for those
elusive "other Masses" where the hosts given to the communicants in far
too many Masses were consecrated...
increase of the
"volume of the megaphone" is becoming manifest in the
Sanctuary of Fátima already.
the Orthodox Church
XVI and the Ecumenical Patriarch
@ US - Published
on September 8th, 2009 [Feast
of Birthday of Mary
I have been tested and found
wanting!!! My wife has left again with the same man and is now living
with him. He claims to be Catholic and they are going to church
together where he lives. The only thing that I am doing is praying for
both of their souls.
They must not realize how much they are mocking God.
I am hoping the "DO NOTHING" message I received in February does not
still apply. I wish to move on and start the divorce process.
My question to you is: When chaos
begins with this economy, in earnest,
there is a strong chance that she will try to come back as she knows of
the food preparations that I have been making to help people God sends
my way. If she tries to come back what are my Christian obligations to
God Bless You, Miguel de Portugal
on their behalf is what God expects you to do; thus, your action
Glorifies God. The greater the transgression one has been the victim
of, the greater the merit accrued by the prayers for the salvation of
Indeed they are
mocking God. That is why your prayers for them are so important -
much reparation is needed.
message that you received in February to "Do Nothing"..... Messages are
both temporary as well as permanent. The earlier "Do Nothing" was
indeed temporary. Allow us to explain...
Divine Mercy demands (1) that we give a full opportunity to an offender to let
bygones be bygones and start anew, and that is exactly what you did
In addition to the demands of Divine Mercy for the benefit of the
offender, God was
testing your level of "Christianity". As we have explained in the
Our Father (2)
we must be very aware that we enter into (or renew) a covenant with God
every time we pray the Our Father. He tests His children like that, not
once, but frequently so that our
charity does not grow cold while, at the same time, He gives us an
opportunity to demonstrate to Him, with concrete and difficult acts,
what we claim to believe. By
"living it" we prove it to Him.
Considering: If she tries to
come back (when chaos reigns)
what are my Christian obligations to her?
Our Lord gave us a
very clear and definite example on how to act in such situation......
in the parable of the Ten Virgins (3)
We are sure that you will see the parallel. If you need further
clarification on how it applies, however, just ask.
Go in the Peace of
God, W. for you are doing the Will of the Father. (4) [Mark 3:35]
(1) The Demands of
Divine Mercy: Example I - Example II
Example IV -
Contrac Terms with Our Father
(3) Matthew 25: 1-13
(4) Mark 3:35
@ Puerto Rico - Published
on September 5th, 2009 [Devotion
your past and recent documents/commentaries (1)
about the consecration
of the hosts not being done properly or not at all.... (about
which my land is not the exception), something in my heart alerts me to
the possibility that this may be one manifestation of what the
said: the abolition of the perpetual sacrifice!
Is that the correct direction?
Thank for the light that you could share with us.
Your work is one manifestation of the Mercy of God. He never leaves
alone his children.
Many continuos blessings!
Your kind words Glorify God Whom we strive to
serve. Thank you for writing
and sharing your concerns.
Your question/comment could not have come at a most timely moment since
God had already indicated that we address this issue in public.
As we have discussed elsewhere, prophecies, just like the readings in
the Holy Bible, can be literal or symbolic or anywhere in between. For
example - God would have used the tragic events of 9-11 as the
fulfillment of Step No.1 if
had responded appropriately - unfortunately humanity did not (3)
Therefore, it could have been symbolic instead being literal as it will
be..... However - it can still be "somewhere in between" if we are
granted a mostly Green Apocalypse as opposed to a nuclear one.
As we look back to the progression of transubstantiation problem we can
discern the pattern that God has brought to miguel's attention:
Initially - early nineties - the actual consecration of the species was
not being done correctly as we pointed out in our original document on
the subject; then
(b) The scheme was to place the
main host in the center of the altar with the rest of the hosts in
their containers on the very edges (left and right) of the altar.
Obviously only the main host was consecrated assuming it was done
(c) The method changed to
offering the communicants in Mass hosts that were in the Tabernacle and
which allegedly had been consecrated in those ever elusive Masses who
no one ever sees.
there are exceptions where all is done properly but those are
"exceptions" and not the rule. The rules (4) are very clear; so
clear, as a matter of fact, that their blatant violation on a
"wholesale level" is enough to indicate that there is concerted behind
the scenes effort to give the communicants non consecrated hosts.
As we have said before - miguel no longer believes, as an act of Faith,
that the Consecrated Host is the Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus
Christ - the true nourishment for our souls; through the Grace of God,
to miguel that is a concrete
reality beyond the realm of Faith.
With that said - If someone was bent on causing as much damage to souls
as possible - the only thing left to do in the world (all else has been
(or is being) done already) is to withdraw that life sustaining
nourishment from as many souls as possible.
Therefore it logically follows that said Biblical prophecy is being
fulfilled with a vengeance.
Know that migeul prays every day that those who are seeking the true
Eucharistc Sacrament in earnest are guided to the chapel or church
where the true Body of Christ is being given to His children who hunger
for the true Bread of Heaven.
and the Curren
State of Sanctuary of Fatima plus many letters in
the Private and Public Forums
Daniel 9:27, 1 Mc 1:45
Bless America yes, but America Must Bless God!
(4) The General Instructions
of the Roman Missal that were reviewed and updated recently speaks
plainly concerning the use of reserved Hosts at Masses:
85. It is most desirable that the
faithful, just as the priest himself is bound to do, receive the Lord's
Body from hosts consecrated at the same Mass and that, in the instances
when it is permitted, they partake of the chalice (cf. below, no. 283),
so that even by means of the signs Communion will stand out more
clearly as a participation in the sacrifice actually being celebrated.
Communion from the Altar, not Tabernacle, during Mass –“The more
complete form of participation in the Mass by which the faithful, after
the priest's communion, receive the Lord's body from the same sacrifice
is strongly endorsed” (Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy, CSL #55).
This is also supported by the revised GIRM, which states that “it is
most desirable that the faithful… receive the Lord's body from hosts
consecrated at the same Mass… so that even by means of the signs,
Communion will stand out more clearly as a participation in the
sacrifice actually being celebrated” (GIRM #85). Only in cases of
necessity should the assembly at Mass communicate from the reserved
sacrament in the tabernacle.
@ US - Published
on August 31st, 2009
your latest mailing (1)
You must have been listening to my own conversations with my children
These were the same words I said [Enough of Marches! Enough of Petitions! Enough
Politicking! Instead - PRAY! PRAY! PRAY!]
why. I told them that such is the reason I pray "without ceasing"
whether I am at daily mass, adoration, or sitting with my rosary.
Nothing else matters and I will not get myself put on a list!
Thank you for yet, another confirmation. I was pretty sure that I was
the only one thinking this way, besides a handful of other prayer group
God bless you
Thank you for writing
and sharing your experience. We are surprised, however, at what you
say: "I was pretty sure that I was
the only one thinking this way,..."
since our first document
exhorting one and all to that - Pray!
- was published eight years ago - in 2001.
This is why it is important to review what we have published in the
last eleven years which can be easily located through Our
As we have said several times - all that is necessary for the Faithful
to safely navigate through the rough seas of the End of These Times we
have published already. Most of what we publish now are reminders
as well as identifying, for what they really are, related events which
are taking place every day.
Again, Thank you!
opportunity to highlight this matter again.
(1) The mailing....
Subject: Enough of Marches!
Enough of Petitions! Enough Politicking! Instead - PRAY! PRAY! PRAY!
May the Peace of God be
We are not calling anyone to
activism" with the
information that we are sharing with our readers regarding the staged
Swine Flu or any other NWO establishing development
As we said in one of our
Enough of Marches! Enough of Petitions! Enough
Politicking! Instead - PRAY! PRAY! PRAY!
It is too late for most
prayer and sacrifice. No number of marches
and petitions will change the course that we are in - the final
stretch. Whatever was going to compress the time of suffering (i.e.
delay Step No. 1) and /or change routing of plans, we have done in the
Name of God.... and there is no more.
All we can do now is minimize the
the blows that awaits humanity through prayer and sacrifice and
educating/informing all who are willing to listen. Prayer and
sacrifice open the doors for God to act and, through His action,
minimize said suffering.
The only "activism" needed
is to share
information regarding what is taking place and what will come next.
When informed people see the
what has been announced by the same individual who also said: Don't despair, it will look like the end
of the world, but it is not!, despair will be minimized.
All satan can do is try to drive
despair as humanity navigates through what will be worse than what we
know as Noah's Flood; however, an informed soul will navigate through
it with trepidation, yes.... but without despairing.
In addition - Eventually, physical
(marches, petitions, politicking, etc.) will give the enemy reason to
label the "activists" as terrorists and/or enemies of the state. Do not
play into the hands of satan. Think about it! and then Pray!
We have published four documents
all the a Christian should do now and why. We recommend that they are
carefully reviewed again and practice the information they contained.
Our prayers accompany your efforts to do the Will of God!
Your Family at The M+G+R Foundation
- 2016 by The M+G+R
Foundation. All rights reserved. However, you may freely reproduce and
distribute this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as
to its source; (2) No changes are made in the text without prior
written consent; and (3) No charge is made for it.
About Us and
Note: If the above dated image
does not appear on this document, it means that you are not viewing the
original document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to
view the original document.
Forum - August 2009
Forum - October 2007 - Edition Files
If you wish to contact
The M+G+R Foundation, please Click Here.