The M+G+R Foundation

Private Forum

September 2009


The purpose of this Private Forum is to share with members of our Mailing List  the response to and/or comment of correspondence that we may receive from time to time and which is of Universal interest in these very unsettling times. Each List Member, may, at his/her discretion, share this page with others.

We reserve the right to choose what questions to address and how to transcribe the question and/or statement from the correspondence received. The identity of the correspondent will be kept confidential except in the case of abusive correspondence which will then be referred to the appropriate responsible entities.


From (Mrs.) MMcK @ USA - Published on September 29th, 2009 [Feast of Sts. Michael, Gabriel and Raphael Archangels]

I was out driving today and saw a man swatting at a wasp in his car.

I was reminded of a Superman comic book that I read when I was a kid.   In it Superman was on trial and was asked if he had ever killed  before. He replied that he had not and they showed him swatting a fly  and asked if he had killed that fly and he said yes, so he had killed  and he had lied.  He was sentenced to die.

Why is this significant?  The fellow who was swatting at the wasp was  using his bible to kill it.  Where is it written that Thou shalt not  kill?  Does it say another human being?  It just says Thou shalt not  kill.

I just thought it was kind of ironic that a bible was being used to kill and wanted to share this with you.


That seemingly innocuous observation contains enough leaven to treat much more than three measures of meal. [Matthew 13:33]

Even before his conversion - at least since his teens - miguel de Portugal felt very strongly that to hunt an animal strictly for the sport of it was very wrong. After his conversion - as many other changes were taking (and continue to take) place - the killing of any creature seemed wrong more and more to the point where even roaches, bees, wasps and flies, for example, are allowed to return to the (or placed back) outdoors without causing them any harm; whenever an insect, like ants, are noticed upon his path while outdoors, he will avoid stepping on them, without it becoming an obsession. He has come to see all of them as integral (not by-products) parts of God's Creation and should be treated as such.

Your letter took miguel's mind-set to another level since specific Biblical readings immediately came to mind:

23 My elect shall not labour in vain, nor bring forth in trouble; for they are the seed of the blessed of the Lord, and their posterity with them. 24 And it shall come to pass, that before they call, I will hear; as they are yet speaking, I will hear. 25 The wolf and the lamb shall feed together; the lion and the ox shall eat straw; and dust shall be the serpent's food: they shall not hurt nor kill in all my holy mountain, saith the Lord. [Isaiah 65]

6 The wolf shall dwell with the lamb: and the leopard shall lie down with the kid: the calf and the lion, and the sheep shall abide together, and a little child shall lead them. 7 The calf and the bear shall feed: their young ones shall rest together: and the lion shall eat straw like the ox. 8 And the sucking child shall play on the hole of the asp: and the weaned child shall thrust his hand into the den of the basilisk. 9 They shall not hurt, nor shall they kill in all my holy mountain, for the earth is filled with the knowledge of the Lord, as the covering waters of the sea. [Isaiah 11]


1 And God blessed Noe and his sons. And he said to them: Increase and multiply, and fill the earth. 2 And let the fear and dread of you be upon all the beasts of the earth, and upon all the fowls of the air, and all that move upon the earth: all the fishes of the sea are delivered into your hand. 3 And every thing that moveth and liveth shall be meat for you: even as the green herbs have I delivered them all to you: 4 Saving that flesh with blood you shall not eat. 5 For I will require the blood of your lives at the hand of every beast, and at the hand of man, at the hand of every man, and of his brother, will I require the life of man. [Genesis 9]

As we said.... your seemingly innocuous observation contains enough leaven to treat far more than three measures of meal. [Matthew 13:33]

How many measures? It will vary depending on the point of the journey of each individual reader.

From (Mr.) WO @ USA - Published on September 25th, 2009

May Christ bless you!
In reference to your  document of  (1), among other things, what struck me is that we need to be very careful when we recite the words of the Creed - Apostle's or that of the Council of Nicea. If I am in any way wrong in what I say here, please do correct me!
Specifically the phrase:" ....and I believe in one, holy, Catholic, and Apostolic church (Nicene) or 'the holy Catholic church' (Apostle's)". I think that one must be very careful in uttering or mentally praying this. One must understand this as being "catholic" (lower case 'c', meaning the one universal church founded by Jesus & loyal to Him)....... NOT as "Catholic" (upper case "C") meaning the man-made organization run amuck, heaquartered in the Vatican - complete with its EENS so-called 'dogma". To understand and believe what we are praying here in these phrases as belief in the Faith........ not "the "Church". These phrases, drilled into our heads since childhood are spiritual/theological "tiger traps"!
On a related point (and I am NOT a Latin or Greek scholar!) in a TV presentation given by some Protestant minister, the point was made that the word "church" did not exist in the time of Christ; but the Latin word "ecclesia" (and its Greek root) did. There would seem to be a big difference between the two words/concepts. "Church" has its roots in German & Scandinavian languages ( i.e. kirk, kirche = church)...... which refers to both a physical building and to an "assembly"; which is the common understanding of the term in reference to a group/organization. On the other hand ":Ecclesia" (the word uttered by Christ) in its Greek root means something completely different. My understanding is that it means "out-calling" or "ones called out....... selected". "It is not too much of a stretch to see how this can be perceived to mean, by extension, "the Elect".
Therefore, if what I understand is correct (and explained properly here) this serves to reinforce what you have said about "the Rock" and the rest of the words which Our Lord spoke to Peter........ which have been misappropriated to refer to the Vatican. There is a big difference between what we call "the church" being the ones "called out from among men by God"........ and "an assembly....... building........ organization...... hiearchial structure....... multi-billion dollar/multinational money machine". Of course if you look in a dictionary you will find that "ecclesia" (and all of its grammatical offshoots) are claimed now to refer to "church". How utterly diabolical!
You remain in my daily prayers.


Thank you for the opportunity to address this issue as well as for your prayers. We are neither Latin nor Greek scholars but - in general terms - we agree with your "church" word analysis.

Now - to the point. We have not prayed the Nicean Creed for some time because, as we may have written years ago, it is theologically incorrect.  It denies the Trinity. On the other hand, the Apostles Creed is essentially flawless and that is the Creed we pray with only one small change.

Where it reads "I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints...." we have changed it to
"I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Faith (2), the communion of saints....". Today's common usage dictates that when we say "Catholic Church" it basically means the "Roman Catholic Church Administration" and in them we certainly do not believe as we have made crystal clear. (3)
(1)  The Once and Future Christendom - A review and commentary
(2) Our full endorsement of the key and basic tenets of the Catholic Faith
(3) Our Position about the Roman Catholic Church Administration - Part I and Part II

From (Mr.) TK @ US - Published on September 22nd, 2009 

See what you think of this page (1).

I ran across it and watched the 1st video.  I don't know.... it seems so hard to believe but.... if we do not take the vaccination, will we be jailed?

God Bless,


As we have stated - Step No. 17 (2)  will be reached sooner than later. That means that "their" options are all open, but as so are God's....

At this point we continue to receive information from totally disconnected physical sources which confirm all that we have, and continue to forecast - including the bogus pandemic.

Now - Regarding the particular page you mention (1): A red Flag is always raised when we see "business opportunities" associated with the "doomsday" predictions. As you will see on the left of the page - in a very visible spot - there is a sign for "Buy Gold Before Its Too Late" (3).

We have obviously known that gold was to rise to unheard of levels since 1991 yet no one has seen us promoting, much less selling gold. [By the way - if we had engaged in such gold trading and hoarding back then, we would have made the proverbial killing and would not have been depending on donations to fulfill the Will of God but, as He admonished us all [Matthew 6:24] - miguel de Portugal could not simultaneously serve God and Mammon. (4)]

We do use the Gold Price Index as a "State of Affairs" Index but not as a recommendation to buy or sell.

As we have said before - there is precious little mankind can do now besides to pray (5), spread the factual information published to awaken those who are still asleep, and plan for the future as we have highlighted in the past (6) to which we now have to add to consuming and stockpiling of vitamin D-3 as you, and others, have done according to a previous correspondence.


(1) The page in question
(2) Sequence of Events
(4) Although the Opus Dei believe that they can.
(5) What can we do - Part I and Part II
Sharing Part I and Sharing Part II

From (Mrs.) IW @ US - Published on September 18th, 2009 

Recently I have had some insights on my behavior and I want to admit them to you.
There have been a few times when I have altered documents that belongs to The M+G+R Foundation and then shared those with others.  Although I did not change the words, I did highlight certain sections to call out a point that I wanted to make.  I did that by changing the color and font of the text.
Also, I now recognize that in so many of my personal e-mails and conversations, meetings, etc. I appropriated The M+G+R Foundation ideas, phrases and wordings and used them without acknowledging their source and to express my personal interpretation of what they meant.  I mentioned that I did this in my meetings with the Jehovah Witnesses, but I did not say that I did it many more times and in other instances.
I do now see your very many efforts to get me to admit what I was doing and to understand that it was wrong.  At the time, I could not or would not see what it was and the points you were trying to make.  Also, I had rationalized with myself that I was only changing the color for emphasis.  But the truth is that it was just disobedience.
I understand how wrong that was, and that it was arrogant of me to change what I believed God delivered and you published, and to use it to urge my beliefs on other people.  It was wrong of me not to ask for permission, as your documents state clearly.  And it would have been honest of me in those cases to share what I wanted to write, or to have shown it to you.
I am very sorry for having done this and I apologize.

If there is anything that I can do to repair for what I have done at this time, please let me know.
Thank you for all the prayers and help.

(Mrs.) IW

A. Your admission of wrongdoing, of course, Glorifies God above all; it also indicates good progress in your journey Home. The closer we get to God - the Light - the easier it is for us to see what is wrong in us and with our behavior, wrongs which we could not see before because we did not have enough light then.

Let us take one item of your letter at a time.

Highlighting: As long as it is indicated that it is the individual's highlighting and not the issuer of the document, letter, etc. - there is no problem whatsoever with that. We, ourselves, try to indicate that is not from the original source
whatever we quote or forward when the highlighting, underscoring, italicizing, etc..

Quoting  parts of documents or utilizing theological concepts without credit:  Whatever we reveal is from God and whatever is from God is free and freely we must give it. The problem arises when the individual implies - overtly or covertly - that the information was delivered to him/her by God.

For example - If you explained in your own words the Secret Concept of the Most Holy Trinity and pass yourself as the vehicle through which God made that know to mankind, you would have a problem - not with us, but with God.

Paraphrasing: In paraphrasing what one reads and learn there is greater latitude. One can say: "I read that m de P says 'this and that'; the way I interpret that is 'thus and such'". This is not a problem since everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion and views.

The main point is: Deceit is never ever from God, regardless of the example the Vatican has given for a good 1,600 years. Then, if it is not from God.... where is it from? 

All Christian must strive at all times not to deceive anyone - we must remember that the most powerful Evangelization tool is the example we give others.

You state/ask:
If there is anything that I can do to repair for what I have done at this time, please let me know.

The answer is: Strive for the Light of God with all your soul and heart - at all times.

In closing we shall quote Wisdom Himself - the Word of God, Jesus Christ:

Neither will I condemn thee. Go, and now sin no more. Again therefore, Jesus spoke to them, saying: I am the light of the world: he that followeth me, walketh not in darkness, but shall have the light of life[John 8:11-12]

From (Ms.) M-AP @ Canada - Published on September 15th, 2009  [Feast of Our Lady of Sorrows]

I would like  to have your insight about what to believe concerning Bayside apparitions.  I've read your comments given on December 15, 2005.

I must say I've always felt a bit awkward when visiting that web site as opposed to other revelations given by our Lady.

Tonight I'm even more troubled regarding the position that the church has taken towards these particular apparitions and the specific denunciation that Bishop Mugavero has expressly written concerning the imposture of Pope Paul VI.

How does a good Christian obey to this?  Do we obey the church?

Bless you!

(Ms.) M-AP

A. Regarding the Bayside apparitions - we have nothing else to add to what we have already said except that it simply "does not feel right" thus it is best to avoid it.

Other key apparitions approved (1) and still pending (2) have more than enough correct and coherent information, thus we recommend to avoid pursuing those which "just do not feel right".

Regarding  the letter allegedly written by Bishop Mugavero (3) - it is a quote by EWTN from "Cults, Sects, and the New Age," Rev. James J. LeBar (OSV Press). We cannot consider either source reliable. EWTN from ample personal experience; and the other one, by default.

Which brings us to your central question: How does a good Christian obey to this?  Do we obey the church?

As we have done in the past, we go to the ultimate source - the Holy Scriptures to back up what we have to say. The answer was already given by Peter and the other Apostles when they addressed the high priest, and they that were with him, the council, and all the ancients of the children of Israel thus [Acts 5]: We ought to obey God, rather than men. [Acts 5: 17-35]

Regardless of the preposterous claims made by the Papacy for centuries, and without taking away the legitimate position and function of the Bishop of Rome (4) - no man takes the place of God and the teachings of even the highest representative of any Faith cannot, under any circumstance, supersede what God has taught us through the Holy Scriptures.

The "Church" or any religious institution representing any faith has only one function: Facilitate, and help maintain, a constructive link between an individual and God. The moment they start trying to supersede the Word of God they can be categorized into one of two categories: The camp of the Anti Christ forerunners or the camp if the False Christ forerunners.

Blessedly - the fundamental teachings of God via the Holy Scriptures, and specifically of Jesus Christ, are so crystal clear that they do not need interpretation. The interpretation starts when man wants to adjust the Word of God to advance his very worldly needs.

What did Jesus tell Peter - the original one! - when he was trying to prevent Jesus from going to Jerusalem?

Get behind me, Satan, thou art a scandal unto me: because thou savourest not the things that are of God, but the things that are of men. [Matthew 16:23]

Shortly after receiving your letter, God "dropped on our lap" a very current example (5)  of continuing conflicting signals that come to the faithful from the highest levels of the Vatican. It was as if He was saying: "In case you need a fresh example, here is one!"

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin's theology was also viewed with caution by officials both of the Jesuit order and in the Vatican. Among other things, officials worried that his optimistic reading of nature compromised church teaching on original sin. In 1962 -- seven years after his death -- the Vatican's doctrinal office issued a warning that his works "abound in such ambiguities and indeed even serious errors, as to offend Catholic doctrine."

In 1981, on the 100th anniversary of Teilhard's birth, speculation erupted about a possible rehabilitation. It was fueled by a letter published in L'Osservatore Romano, the Vatican newspaper, by the then-Cardinal Secretary of State Agostino Casaroli, who praised the "astonishing resonance of his research, as well as the brilliance of his personality and richness of his thinking." Casaroli asserted that Teilhard had anticipated John Paul II's call to "be not afraid," embracing "culture, civilization and progress."

Responding to ferment created by the letter, the Vatican issued a statement insisting that its 1962 verdict on Teilhard still stands -- to date, Rome's last official pronouncement on Teilhard. (The statement was issued in July 1981, four months before then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the future Pope Benedict XVI, took over as prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.)

[Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was Jesuit priest, scientist and philosopher .]

fast forward in time.....

Benedict's brief of July 24 (2009) in reference to Teilhard, praising his vision of the entire cosmos as a "living host," can be read on multiple levels -- as part of the pontiff's rapprochement with the Jesuits, or as a further instance of finding something positive to say about thinkers whose works have set off doctrinal alarms, as Benedict previously did with rebel Swiss theologian and former colleague Hans Küng.

Toward the end of a reflection upon the Letter to the Romans, in which St. Paul writes that the world itself will one day become a form of living worship, the pope said, "It's the great vision that later Teilhard de Chardin also had: At the end we will have a true cosmic liturgy, where the cosmos becomes a living host. "Let's pray to the Lord that he help us be priests in this sense," the pope said, "to help in the transformation of the world in adoration of God, beginning with ourselves."
There you have it! Is Teilhard "approved" or not? Are his teachings approved or not? All we know is that the Faithful have enough reason to be confused and it behooves them to place their full trust in God and His Word (6). It really is that simple!

Thank you M-A for the opportunity to address this issue one more time, albeit from a different angle.
(1)  La Salette, Fatima and Akita
(2)  Rosa Mystica, Garabandal and Medjugorje
(3)  EWTN Publication
(4) The legitimate Petrine Ministry
(5) Benedict XVI cites Teilhardian vision of the cosmos as a 'living host'
(6) The Foundation of the Faith is God

From (Mr.) SB @ US - Published on September 12th, 2009  [Holy Name of Mary]

With regard to your posting of the 3rd (1), one can easily see the dismembering of the Roman Catholic Church as nearly complete.

It can also be seen that the Orthodox Churches will be the catacombs of these times.


That is correct to a certain extent since each Orthodox Patriarchate is independent from each other (2) - as it was from the beginning - and it is only loosely connected through the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Istanbul (Constantinople).

Unfortunately - even though the Ecumenical Patriarch (3) was informed years ago as to what was taking place, he seems to have "fallen for" Benedict XVI  (4)
However, this should have little effect on the purity of many of the very independent Patriarchates.

We are quite confident that most of the Eucharist being offered in the Orthodox Churches as well as the Eastern Rite Roman Catholic Churches worldwide is indeed the Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ. Unfortunatelyy, we do not have the same confidence level regarding the traditional Roman Catholic Churches. We are still searching for those elusive "other Masses" where the hosts given to the communicants in far too many Masses were consecrated...

(1) The  increase of the "volume of the megaphone"  is becoming manifest in the Sanctuary of Fátima already. 
(2) About the Orthodox Church
(3) The Ecumenical Patriarch is informed
Benedict XVI and the Ecumenical Patriarch

From (Mr.) I(nitials)W(ithheld) @ US - Published on September 8th, 2009  [Feast of Birthday of Mary]

I have been tested and found wanting!!! My wife has left again with the same man and is now living with him. He claims to be Catholic and they are going to church together where he lives. The only thing that I am doing is praying for both of their souls.

They must not realize how much they are mocking God.

I am hoping the "DO NOTHING" message I received in February does not still apply. I wish to move on and start the divorce process.

My question to you is: When chaos begins with this economy, in earnest, there is a strong chance that she will try to come back as she knows of the food preparations that I have been making to help people God sends my way. If she tries to come back what are my Christian obligations to her?
God Bless You, Miguel de Portugal


Prayer on their behalf is what God expects you to do; thus, your action Glorifies God. The greater the transgression one has been the victim of, the greater the merit accrued by the prayers for the salvation of the trangressor(s).

Indeed they are mocking God.  That is why your prayers for them are so important - much reparation is needed.

Regarding the message that you received in February to "Do Nothing"..... Messages are both temporary as well as permanent. The earlier "Do Nothing" was indeed temporary. Allow us to explain...

Divine Mercy demands
(1) that we give a full opportunity to an offender to let bygones be bygones and start anew, and that is exactly what you did unconditionally.

In addition to the demands of Divine Mercy for the benefit of the offender,  God was testing your level of "Christianity".  As we have explained in the Our Father (2) document, we must be very aware that we enter into (or renew) a covenant with God every time we pray the Our Father. He tests His children like that, not once, but frequently so that our charity does not grow cold while, at the same time, He gives us an opportunity to demonstrate to Him, with concrete and difficult acts, what we claim to believe. By "living it" we prove it to Him.

Considering: If she tries to come back (when chaos reigns) what are my Christian obligations to her?

Our Lord gave us a very clear and definite example on how to act in such situation...... in the parable of the Ten Virgins (3)

We are sure that you will see the parallel. If you need further clarification on how it applies, however,  just ask.

Go in the Peace of God, W. for you are doing the Will of the Father. (4) [Mark 3:35]

(1) The Demands of Divine Mercy:  Example I -
Example II Example III Example IV -
(2)  The Contrac Terms with Our Father
(3)  Matthew 25: 1-13
(4)  Mark 3:35

From (Mrs.) RM @ Puerto Rico - Published on September 5th, 2009 [Devotion of First Saturday of the Month]

In reference to your past and recent documents/commentaries (1) about the consecration of the hosts not being done properly or not at all....  (about which my land is not the exception), something in my heart alerts me to the possibility that this may be one manifestation of what the Scripture (2) said: the abolition of the perpetual sacrifice!

Is that the correct direction?

Thank for the light that you could share with us.

Your work is one manifestation of the Mercy of God. He never leaves alone his children.

Many continuos blessings!

(Mrs.) RM

  Your kind words Glorify God Whom we strive to serve. Thank you for writing and sharing your concerns.

Your question/comment could not have come at a most timely moment since God had already indicated that we address this issue in public.

As we have discussed elsewhere, prophecies, just like the readings in the Holy Bible, can be literal or symbolic or anywhere in between. For example - God would have used the tragic events of 9-11 as the fulfillment of Step No.1 if humanity had responded appropriately - unfortunately humanity did not (3)
Therefore, it could have been symbolic instead being literal as it will be..... However - it can still be "somewhere in between" if we are granted a mostly Green Apocalypse as opposed to a nuclear one.

As we look back to the progression of transubstantiation problem we can discern the pattern that God has brought to miguel's attention:

(a) Initially - early nineties - the actual consecration of the species was not being done correctly as we pointed out in our original document on the subject; then
(b) The scheme was to place the main host in the center of the altar with the rest of the hosts in their containers on the very edges (left and right) of the altar. Obviously only the main host was consecrated assuming it was done properly; finally
(c) The method changed to offering the communicants in Mass hosts that were in the Tabernacle and which allegedly had been consecrated in those ever elusive Masses who no one ever sees.

Granted, there are exceptions where all is done properly but those are "exceptions" and not the rule. The rules (4) are very clear; so clear, as a matter of fact, that their blatant violation on a "wholesale level" is enough to indicate that there is concerted behind the scenes effort to give the communicants non consecrated hosts.

As we have said before - miguel no longer believes, as an act of Faith, that the Consecrated Host  is the Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ - the true nourishment for our souls; through the Grace of God, to miguel that is a concrete reality beyond the realm of Faith.

With that said - If someone was bent on causing as much damage to souls as possible - the only thing left to do in the world (all else has been (or is being) done already) is to withdraw that life sustaining nourishment from as many souls as possible.

Therefore it logically follows that said Biblical prophecy is being fulfilled with a vengeance.

Know that migeul prays every day that those who are seeking the true Eucharistc Sacrament in earnest are guided to the chapel or church where the true Body of Christ is being given to His children who hunger for the true Bread of Heaven.

(1) About Transubstantiation and the Curren State of Sanctuary of Fatima plus many letters in the Private and Public Forums

(2)  Daniel 9:27, 1 Mc 1:45
(3)  God Bless America yes, but America Must Bless God!
(4)  The General Instructions of the Roman Missal that were reviewed and updated recently speaks plainly concerning the use of reserved Hosts at Masses:

85. It is most desirable that the faithful, just as the priest himself is bound to do, receive the Lord's Body from hosts consecrated at the same Mass and that, in the instances when it is permitted, they partake of the chalice (cf. below, no. 283), so that even by means of the signs Communion will stand out more clearly as a participation in the sacrifice actually being celebrated.

Holy Communion from the Altar, not Tabernacle, during Mass –“The more complete form of participation in the Mass by which the faithful, after the priest's communion, receive the Lord's body from the same sacrifice is strongly endorsed” (Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy, CSL #55). This is also supported by the revised GIRM, which states that “it is most desirable that the faithful… receive the Lord's body from hosts consecrated at the same Mass… so that even by means of the signs, Communion will stand out more clearly as a participation in the sacrifice actually being celebrated” (GIRM #85). Only in cases of necessity should the assembly at Mass communicate from the reserved sacrament in the tabernacle.

From (Mrs.) KH @ US
- Published on August 31st, 2009

In reference to your latest mailing (1)....

You must have been listening to my own conversations with my children this week!

These were the same words I said [Enough of Marches! Enough of Petitions! Enough Politicking! Instead - PRAY! PRAY! PRAY!] and why. I told them that such is the reason I pray "without ceasing" whether I am at daily mass, adoration, or sitting with my rosary.

Nothing else matters and I will not get myself put on a list!

Thank you for yet, another confirmation. I was pretty sure that I was the only one thinking this way, besides a handful of other prayer group members.

God bless you

(Mrs.) KH

Thank you for writing and sharing your experience. We are surprised, however, at what you say: "I was pretty sure that I was the only one thinking this way,..." since our first document exhorting one and all to that - Pray! Pray! Pray! - was published eight years ago - in 2001.

This is why it is important to review what we have published in the last eleven years which can be easily located through  Our Research Department

As we have said several times - all that is necessary for the Faithful to safely navigate through the rough seas of the End of These Times we have published already.  Most of what we publish now are reminders as well as identifying, for what they really are, related events which are taking place every day.

Again, Thank you! for the opportunity to highlight this matter again.

(1)  The mailing....

Subject: Enough of Marches! Enough of Petitions! Enough Politicking! Instead - PRAY! PRAY! PRAY!

May the Peace of God be upon you!

We are not calling anyone to "physical activism" with the information that we are sharing with our readers regarding the staged Swine Flu or any other NWO establishing development

As we said in one of our documents:

Enough of Marches! Enough of Petitions! Enough Politicking! Instead - PRAY! PRAY! PRAY!

It is too late for most anything else besides prayer and sacrifice. No number of marches and petitions will change the course that we are in - the final stretch. Whatever was going to compress the time of suffering (i.e. delay Step No. 1) and /or change routing of plans, we have done in the Name of God.... and there is no more.

All we can do now is minimize the severity of the blows that awaits humanity through prayer and sacrifice and educating/informing all who are willing to listen. Prayer and sacrifice open the doors for God to act and, through His action, minimize said suffering.

The only "activism" needed is to share information regarding what is taking place and what will come next.

When informed people see the manifestation of what has been  announced by the same individual who also said: Don't despair, it will look like the end of the world, but it is not!, despair will be minimized.

All satan can do is try to drive people to despair as humanity navigates through what will be worse than what we know as Noah's Flood; however, an informed soul will navigate through it with trepidation, yes.... but without despairing.

In addition - Eventually, physical activism (marches, petitions, politicking, etc.) will give the enemy reason to label the "activists" as terrorists and/or enemies of the state. Do not play into the hands of satan. Think about it! and then Pray!

We have published four documents which lists all the a Christian should do now and why. We recommend that they are carefully reviewed again and practice the information they contained. They are:

Pray! Pray! Pray!

And then, Pray More!

What Can We Do? - Part I

What Can We Do? - Part II

Our prayers accompany your efforts to do the Will of God!

Your Family at The M+G+R Foundation

Private Forum - August 2009   and beyond

Last Public Forum - October 2007 - Edition Files

© Copyright 2009  - 2016 by The M+G+R Foundation. All rights reserved. However, you may freely reproduce and distribute this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as to its source; (2) No changes are made in the text without prior written consent; and (3) No charge is made for it.

The M+G+R Foundation
About Us and Frequently Asked Questions



HOME PAGE - Español

HOME PAGE - Portugues


Our Research Department

To Search for Information Within Our Domain Click Here

Document Indexes: - Sorted by Title - Sorted by File Name

Future Use

Please Note: If the above dated image does not appear on this document, it means that you are not viewing the original document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to view the original document.

If you wish to contact The M+G+R Foundation, please Click Here.