The M+G+R Foundation
The Public Forum
Letters/Questions - Addressed
Please Note: There will be no further
updates to this page. The last letters
answered in this Forum are listed below. All previous
letters addressed in this Forum may be accessed through the Link
provided at the bottom of this page.
The purpose of this Public Forum is to
publicly respond to and/or comment upon correspondence that we may
receive from time to time and which is of Universal interest in these
very unsettling times.
We reserve the right to choose what
questions to address and how to transcribe the question and/or
statement from the correspondence received. The identity of the
correspondent will be kept confidential except in the case of abusive
correspondence which will then be referred to the appropriate
From KT @ USA
- Published on October 17th, 2007
ONE QUESTION......... I HAVE ALWAYS
BELIEVED THAT THE END NEVER JUSTIFIES THE MEANS. YET YOU PROPOSED
THAT AN EXCEPTION BE MADE FOR THE PEOPLE OF AFRICA FOR THE USE OF
CONDOMS TO HELP PREVENT AIDS..... JUST FOR A CERTAIN LENGTH OF TIME!
THIS CONFUSES ME., HOWEVER, I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU ON THIS
MATTER AS PEOPLE ARE KILLING EACH OTHER.
THEY DO NOT HAVE "EYES TO SEE OR EARS TO HEAR." HOW CAN ONE
JUSTIFY BAD BEHAVIOR BY SAYING SOMEONE IS SICK?
HOW CAN WE FORGIVE THOSE WHO ACCEPT BAD MONEY FOR A GOOD CAUSE ,
HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN TO A NON CHRISTIAN THAT GOD ALLOWS BAD THINGS TO
HAPPEN? ACCIDENTS, VICTIMS OF CRIME?
I KNOW WELL OF FREE CHOICE BUT IT DOES NOT CONVINCE A NON-BELIEVER.
FORGIVE ME FOR ALL OF THE QUESTIONS, BUT YOU ARE MY FAMILY AND I TRUST
ALL OF YOU AS I KNOW YOU ARE DOING GOD'S WILL AND I BELIEVE IN YOU.
I WISH I HAD 3 MONTHS JUST TO SIT
AND LISTEN TO YOU.
GOD BLESS YOU FOR ALL OF YOU PATIENCE, LOVE AND
UNDERSTANDING............ ESPECIALLY OF THE WEAK ONES LIKE ME.
IN HIS NAME AND GRACE,
Thank your for writing and sharing your concerns with
We also believe, and have frequently said, that the "End does not
justify the means", however, we must evaluate each individual situation
with the Light of the Holy Spirit to see how we should get from point
"A" (living outside the Law of God) to point "B" (living within the Law
The first step is to determine the "Why" of the point "A" and its
consequences - short term and long term.
We shall take first the killing of another human being as a point "A" -
this is extremely grave under any circumstances : There is no just war;
there is no just killing. Logically, point "B" is the stopping of the
killing of human beings.
Say that we have an individual who is prone to kill other humans due to
X,Y and Z reasons and does so on a regular basis. Maybe he does not
know that "Thou shalt not kill" is a real and absolute Divine Law.
Obviously he needs to be instructed in Divine Law and needs to be
assisted in his conversion - however, in the meantime, he cannot be
allowed to go around killing people until "the Evangelization" takes a
hold of his soul. He must be stopped for the benefit of others and
Now, let us take up birth control as another point "A" situation.
What is the root problem of artificial birth control? Sexual
interaction without responsibility becomes just another sport - where
one may even switch partners just as we may do for a tennis
match. The more uneducated the individual is and the less means
of entertainment he/she may have, the more he/she will turn to sex
and/or drugs as an "entertaining sport". The more bored a rich
and well educated individual gets, the more he/she will also turn to
sex and/or drugs as an "entertaining sport".
Promiscuous sex and the use of drugs are the two societal maladies
which can harm a soul the most. Thus, logically God has allowed
AIDS. He is more interested in our soul within the overall Eternal
picture, than just the brief time it resides in a body on Earth. If
some activity is going to gravely harm the soul - He rather take them
home soon. (1)
In the birth control situation - We could then take two positions: (a)
Let them destroy themselves and thus "help God"; or (b) Intervene and
help them find the way to God in a more natural way.
If we take position (a), it would logically follows, to the derange
minds, that all sick and poor people should be exterminated.... and
"...by doing this we are doing them a favor and serving God along."
(believe it or not, that thinking is "on the table" of the Future
Masters of the world.)
If we take position (b), we assist them in not killing each other,
through unprotected sexual intercourse, by providing them with the
appropriate protection WHILE simultaneously
Evangelizing them so that they will abandon the "Outside the Laws of
God" lifestyle, i.e. "Sexual activity is a sport."
In certain countries of Europe they established a "Clean Syringe
Program" wherein the drug addicts would turn in their used syringes and
get clean ones in ordered to arrest the spread of AIDS through sharing
infected syringes. This was done WITHOUT any Evangelization, therefore,
what on the surface looked like a very charitable act was indeed
contributing to the further degradation of their souls.
This would be the same if we just pass out condoms and do nothing else.
(a) Passing out condoms to
prevent the spread of AIDS via sexual intercourse - and do nothing else - to
save lives cannot be considered as a "means justified by the end" -
because we are working against God by helping in the destruction of
(b) Passing out condoms to prevent the spread of AIDS via sexual
intercourse - and implement
a solid Evangelization program to change the mentality of the
individuals through Light and Grace - is a method of "buying
time" while the leaven of the kingdom of heaven works its wonders in
their souls - thus we are cooperating with God' plan for His children. [The kingdom of heaven is like to leaven,
which a woman took and hid in three measures of meal, until the whole
was leavened. [Matthew 13:33]]
Of course, this
thinking could degenerate into a philosophical discussion about the
difference or equivalence of murdering/killing with a gun, for example,
and killing with an AIDS contaminated sexual liaison. However, we must
keep in mind that: Death by gunshot is quick and little can be done to
draw the soul to God before separation of soul and body. Death through
AIDS is slow and much can be done to draw that soul to God before its
separation. Therefore - we cannot compare, nor treat alike, both
methods of killing a body.
Your other questions have been answered in different documents in our
Regarding what "does not convince a non believer" is completely outside
the responsibility of the Elect. We are to take a horse to water, drink
of it so that the horse sees that it quenches our thirst with no
ill effects; then, if the horse still refuses to drink, we must allow
the horse to die of thirst. The Elect never were nor will ever be
part of the Inquisition crowd. Their technique would have been
"choking the horse to death" while force feeding him water to "keep him
Yes, that is how ridiculous and pathetic the alleged Evangelization has
been in the last ca. 1600 years.... and stay tuned, as we have already
explained, it will be tried again. (3)
(1) The near Apocalyptic Climatic and Geological
(2) Pain is the megaphone....
, Divine Mercy in Action - Part
I and Part II
(3) The striking similarity of the
French Revolution with the activities "scheduled" for End of These Times
From EMcK @
USA - Published on October 15th, 2007 [Memorial
of St. Teresa de Jesus aka St. Teresa de Avila]
May God continue to bless you.
Thank you for all of your assistance and clarification of issues that
have a tendency to become cloudy.
This is not terribly urgent, it is just
that I know you'll have an answer to a question I always have had.
How and why are the Archangels Gabriel,
Michael and Raphael referred to also as saints? I really
understood saints to be human beings who submitted to God's will and
were taken to heaven after their physical lives were ended.
Angels, and I say this with the utmost love and respect for them, were
never human beings, although they have appeared to various individuals
to be human. (I'm pretty certain I've had at least one of those
experiences myself!) Haven't the angels always been part of
the spiritual plain?
Since God has moved me to finally ask
this question after having wondered about it for years … some
clarification would be received with great enthusiasm.
Thanks very much and again, may God
continue to bless you … and us through you.
In the Roman
Catholic Catechism as published on-line by the Vatican we read:
946 After confessing "the holy catholic
Church," the Apostles' Creed adds "the communion of saints." In a
certain sense this article is a further explanation of the preceding:
"What is the Church if not the assembly of all the saints?" The
communion of saints is the Church.
948 The term "communion of saints" therefore has two closely linked
meanings: communion in holy things (sancta)" and "among holy persons
956 The intercession of the saints. "Being more closely united to
Christ, those who dwell in heaven fix the whole Church more firmly in
holiness.... They do not cease to intercede with the Father for us, as
they proffer the merits which they acquired on earth through the one
mediator between God and men, Christ Jesus.... So by their fraternal
concern is our weakness greatly helped."
Now, with the "Party Line" quoted word by word, let us clear the smoke
with some light.
What is read above is true except
that is not limited to "Members Only" - the communion of saints encompasses all
who on Earth are members of Jesus' family as defined by Jesus Himself -
the Ultimate Authority:
whosoever shall do the will of my Father, that is in heaven, he is my
brother, and sister, and mother. [Matthew 12:50]
as well as those who are in Purgatory
and those who are already in Heaven (both of which are obviously Family
Now, "Saints", like Teresa de Jesus, is a "saint" whom the Roman
Catholic Administration has officially designated as an exemplar
figure. Therefore "all Saints are saints" but "not all saints are
Saints".... then again, there are some Saints which are a mockery to
Therefore, generally speaking, pure spiritual creatures, as
angels are, fall in the category of "the Family of Jesus", thus, we can
joyfully refer to them as "saint" or "Saint".
As a matter of confirmation - angels do appear frequently
in a rather
"average" looking human countenance... although one has "a feeling"
that he is just not "the guy next door".
(1) Opus Dei's Escriva although he is not the
only one to fit such category.
From HW @ USA - Published on October 13th,
2007 [90th Anniversary of the Miracle of the Sun in Fatima]
In reference to your latest mailing and the following Biblical
quotation which is part of it.
3 No, I say to you: but unless you shall do penance, you
shall all likewise perish. 4 Or those
eighteen upon whom the tower fell in Siloe, and slew them: think you,
that they also were debtors above all the men that dwelt in Jerusalem?
5 No, I say to you; but except you do penance, you shall all
likewise perish. [Luke 13]
Its interesting the choice of the Biblical translations of some
I read from the Douay-Rheims (d-r) and the 1611 King James (kjv)
version. kjv uses "repentance" or "repent" and the (d-r)
uses "penance" in the same passage. Different meanings. I have
found this discrepancy in other publications when biblical
passages are quoted. Catholics use "penance" and kjv uses
"repentance" in the same verse. I wonder which is right?
you for writing, thus allowing to address this issue once again.
First of all, a thorough review of our documents Biblical Literalism
Parts I (1)
and II (2)
will help clarify the "why" of so many different "Words of God" (when
there is really one!). We recommend the review of those documents
since they will serve to fortify the Faith in the Word of God.
However, for those who hang their whole faith or bigotry on one out of
context ill translated verse, those documents have the same effect as
the proverbial showing of a cross to a vampire....
We do not think neither you nor most of our readers fall in that
category. Thanks be to God!
Now, the direct answer to your question: "I wonder which is right?
The correct word is indeed "repentance".
Your inquisitive mind Glorifies God.
(1) Biblical Literalism Part I
(2) Biblical Literalism Part II
From SB @ USA
- Published on October 11th, 2007 [Feast
of the Motherhood of Mary]
May the Lord's Peace be ever with you!
I hope that you will recall me. In times past you have been both
guide and almost confessor to me.
I am writing in regard to a recent posting regarding psychiatric drugs.
I am sure you don't recall the many times of euphoria and then
desperate depression, in which I have contacted you. In short, I
finally found some assistance in that I was diagnosed as bi-polar, and
am no much more ready to cope. I have, as I mentioned before,
joined the Orthodox Church, and find my life to be "leveling out".
In your recent mailing (1)
an author who wrote "Talking Back to Prozac" discussed Tom Cruise's
I got the impression that you do not approve such drugs. Now I
find myself in a spiritual quandary, wondering if I have done wrong and
will jeopardize my soul in the long run.
I know you are busy, and I know I may have to wait for your response,
but as you promised in the past, I know you will respond now.
Yours in Christ Jesus
A. Of course
we remember you and rejoice at the progress you have made through the
Grace of God.
As we mentioned to you right after we received your communication - you
have nothing to be concerned about nor any changes need to be made in
the medication you take. We will use a very "well known face"
since m de P's is not (and most need to have a face to believe) to
illustrate a very important point.
Padre Pio of Pietrelcina was one of the greatest miracle worker on the
20th Century and the healing through his hands were, and are,
legendary. What most people are not aware of is that, many times,
some of those who came to him to be healed would be sent by Padre Pio
to see a physician instead of working a miraculous cure.
Why? Because there are some physical illness which are 100 % organic and need to be treated
accordingly. We have learned through the Grace of God and
the experiences with which He has Graced us, that most illnesses
are due to spiritual dysfunction (2); however,
the ones which are not, need to be treated through traditional or
When there is an actual organic illness that requires medical
attention, a "miraculous" cure can be secured through the same method
St. Joseph statues sell houses; unfortunately, the illness, after
a while, reappears with a vengeance. [We are
not referring here about true miraculous cures which God dispenses at
His pleasure because in those cases, He not only removes the problem
but He also corrects whatever organic problem caused it.]
A good and honest (MD) diagnostician can help the patient
determine which is the best route to follow [always secure a second
Our mailing reflects our concern about the "Pill Dispensing Happy"
physicians and the "Desirous For A Quick Fix Happy" patients. As
we often say - the brain is not stuffing to keep the cranium from
collapsing due to a vacuum; the brain is to be used with the
Illumination of the Holy Spirit of God to safely navigate through life.
(1) The mailing in question follows:
As a result of our postings on Scientology we came across the following
article. Please, do note who is its author:
On June 25, 2005 Tom Cruise did the
unthinkable on TV. Actually, he did several "unthinkables"
in a filmed interview with NBC's Matt Lauer for the Today Show.
First, Tom stopped smiling. He deprived us of that multi-million
dollar grin and got serious. For a star to do this to the
American public was unthinkable.
Second, Tom pointed out that Matt Lauer actually was very "glib"
(shallow) and didn't know what he was talking about. He
also urged Matt to be "more responsible" and to learn something about
psychiatry before touting it. For a star to do this to a media
personality was unthinkable. Since nearly all of them are
shallow, this was a threat of potentially epidemic proportions.
Suppose other guests began pointing out that media hosts don't know
what they are talking about and are shallow?
Third, he got serious about one of the most important issues in our
personal lives, in this case our widespread use of psychiatric drugs to
solve our personal distress and anguish. Tom concluded,
"I'm passionate about life." For anyone to speak this way on
television, except perhaps on the Catholic channel, is truly beyond the
TV pale; and even the Catholic channel doesn't criticize psychiatry.
Fourth, he criticized psychiatry and drew attention to its genuine
flaws and failings. I suspect he's actually read my book, Toxic
Psychiatry. Tom said that psychiatry had a long history of
abusing people, including electroshock. He said, "There is no
such thing as a chemical imbalance." He said that antidepressants
can only "mask the problem" and that "these drugs are very
dangerous." He called psychiatry a "pseudoscience" and suggested
that there are better approaches. He was right about all of
A few days later NBC invited me to New York City as a psychiatric
expert to discuss the Tom Cruise affair on the Today Show, and when I
began by saying it sounded like Tom had been doing some serious reading
about psychiatry, I got cut off, again and again, throughout the show.
Why was the media both drawn into the story and shocked by
it? It was too good a story to simply ignore: "Tom Cruise
Gone Wild" was the theme. It should have been, "Tom Cruise
The media would have liked to attack Tom on the grounds that he's a
Scientologist. Scientologists seem to share a number of
views about psychiatry with me, including everything Tom said. In
fact, I'd go further. Modern biological psychiatry is a
materialistic religion masquerading as a science.
How can I say that my profession of psychiatry is a materialistic
religion? Because modern psychiatry makes believe that
psychological and spiritual problems, such as anxiety and depression,
are caused by mechanical failures in the physical brain, and because
psychiatry then attempts to correct these psychological and spiritual
problems with physical interventions such as drugs and
electroshock. Modern biological psychiatry takes these
views and implements these interventions on faith and it has won a lot
of converts with the help of billion-dollar marketing campaigns.
If you want more detailed analyses of the faith and fake science behind
the claims of modern psychiatry, you'll find them in my books such as
Toxic Psychiatry (1991), Brain-Disabling Treatments in Psychiatry
(1997), Talking Back to Ritalin (Revised, 2001), the Antidepressant
Fact Book (2001) and the Ritalin Fact Book (2002). You can find my
scientific papers on my website
my books and on the website you'll also find discussions of the many
drug-free alternatives that are available for helping people with
problems such as anxiety and depression.
The media kept hinting that the problem was Tom's Scientology beliefs
but they didn't want to say it. To some extent it's not
politically correct to criticize someone's religion, especially when
people like Tom and John Travolta are members. But that was
really not the issue. The media is afraid of Scientology
because the religion has been extremely aggressive toward media
critics, often charging them or threatening to charge them with libel
I was also invited on to CNBC's the Donny Deutche talk
show. This time I remained in Ithaca, New York only a few
blocks from my office in a high tech TV studio. I was kept
waiting in front of the live camera for almost an hour and a half to
get a word in as I watched Tom get excoriated. Although I could
see the show on the uplink for this entire time as I sat waiting at any
moment to be called upon, they decided not to link me into the show at
all and I never got to say a thing in Tom's defense or in criticism of
biological psychiatry, drugs and electroshock. Sitting upright
that long without twitching in anticipation of momentarily appearing on
millions of televisions was hard enough, but listening to Donny was
While I sat listening to the CNBC show that I was never brought onto, I
felt a mixture of outrage and sadness. Outrage that the show host
Donny Deutche bragged up his work in advertising where he helped to
produce the Zoloft TV ads with their clever little bouncing faces that
made the antidepressant so much more "accessible," in his words, to
millions of Americans. Donny was bragging about an actual
fraud"”ads that falsely suggest that Zoloft corrects biochemical
imbalances and that leave out the warning that the drug causes mania,
not to mention psychosis, violence and suicide.
What was tragic? Donny's guest was Jane Pauley who was flogging
her new book, Out of the Blue. Jane is the epitome of a media
personality, having anchored the Today Show with Tom Brokaw and Bryant
Gumbel, and having earned many broadcast awards. Jane is also a
promoter of psychiatry. She admitted to having developed
"hypomanic" (milder than full-blown mania) symptoms on an
antidepressant. At the time, she explained, her mind and
thoughts were racing and she couldn't control them. But then she added
that of course the drug didn't make her become manic; the drug just
"brought out" her underlying or pre-existing bipolar disorder.
Of course, I don't know anything about Jane Pauley except what she's
told us and she's not really the issue. Celebrities are
actively recruited by marketing departments to promote medical and
psychiatric treatments. I do know that psychiatrists often lie to
patients to protect themselves and their drugs. My
colleagues lie by saying the antidepressant merely "brought out" their
mania, psychosis, violence or depression, rather than the drug caused
it in the otherwise innocent victim. Jane Pauley thinks she is a
victim of bipolar disorder when she sounds to me like a victim of
It's no small matter to falsely inform a person that their drug-induced
mania shows they have bipolar disorder. It results in a
false diagnosis and a stigmatizing label (bipolar or manic-depressive
disorder) that follows people for the rest of their lives.
It leads to additional medications, often including antipsychotic drugs
like Zyprexa and Risperdal that can cause lethal diabetes and
pancreatitis, and tardive dyskinesia, a potentially disfiguring and
disabling neurological disorder characterized by bizarre-looking
So the media personalities had a feast promoting their religion,
psychiatry, while Tom Cruise got hammered for criticizing psychiatry,
and indirectly promoting his religion, Scientology.
No, I'm not a Scientologist. Except when they occasionally
say hello to me at conferences, I have hardly spoken to a Scientologist
in more than thirty years. But when I saw Tom's bravery come out
from behind his marvelous smile, I wanted to help, and I made clear I
wanted to defend him.
Well, Tom, you said on TV things I've been saying in the media and in
my books and scientific articles for three decades"”but boy did you
generate a lot more attention to the issues. Thanks!
Dysfunction - Its Identification, Treatment and Cure
From YDM @ USA - Published on October 7th,
2007 [Our Lady of the Rosary]
[For the convenience of the Faithful we will place our answers
and comments within the text itself indicating them with an
"A." and in italic letters.]
Again, please forgive
my ignorance, but although I have read very many of your articles, my
mind just can't understand the political intrigues and maneuvers of
people in power. It is so confusing to me, that I just pray and
leave to God what must happen to correct the people He wishes to save.
Confusing is not the word - it is
worse than following a chess game in three dimensions plus one - time.
We publish that information for two reasons: (1) (a) Those who can follow it will have a
ring side seat to the Apocalypse and will see how it all unfolds; (b)
To clearly indicate the ties between men of "Faith", so to speak, and
the political maneuvering in the world which has nothing to do with God
no matter how many times His Holy Name is used in vain. However, the
problem would be if miguel could not understand it so that he may act
upon it in accordance to the Will of God.
Understanding certainly IS NOT
a condition of Salvation nor it will affect the minimization (2) of future suffering. Each one of you will
understand it when and how
God determines it is time for it to be understood, not when
miguel wants - even though we are accused of telling people what to do.
What we exhort people to do, indeed, is to Pray and allow the Will of
God to guide their every step (3). There can be no failure with that.
I still talk to my adult children (we all live together, 5 adult
children and 5 grandchildren) and grandchildren about the importance of
living in the state of grace, being thankful to God and the Blessed
Mother for every single thing (including blue skies, food on the table,
being together) and trying to be loving persons. I am in
horrific darkness, but I am surprised how none of this really bothers
me. Am I in denial?
No, you are not in denial. (4) Although you are indeed in a horrific
darkness, we have no doubt that you are not really bothered by it. Why
should you be? Explaining it in material terms: You find yourself in
the darkness of nights, a night without a moon BUT wearing night vision
goggles. In spiritual terms the "night vision goggles" are
nothing else that Having the Holy Spirit of God in residence in your
heart and guiding your every step. When the Holy Spirit of God guides
our every step - why should we worry? It is really that simple.
This is why we keep calling for a
single minded effort develop a real, working and intimate relation with
the Holy Spirit of God. (5)
I do as many of the things you suggest in the way of prayer, and
listen to God as best I can, and although I tremble (spiritually)
I lead as normal a life as I can.
A. And that IS precisely why, even though
you are submerged in total darkness, you are not personally bothered by
it. But we are called arrogant and evil by those whose control of other
human beings, through codependency, (6) and who are threatened by what we
recommend in the Name of God.
Please forgive me for telling you all of these things, but I need to
know if there is anything other I should be doing? Sometimes I
need someone to tell me I am on the right track. Sorry to say I
don't trust many priests or anyone else for that matter.
A. That is one of the reasons for which we
exist. The only things that you need to keep doing.... is what you are
doing - always striving to draw closer to God and fulfill His Will (not
what we want His Will to be (7)) at every turn.
My family tolerates my beliefs, but think I make too much of
everything. I tolerate them with much love, because the warning
will enlighten them.
You actions are acts of silent
Evangelization. The moment an expected major global event takes place
and/or the warning takes place - most of those seeds of Evangelization
you are dropping "here and there" will sprout to full bloom so fast
that it will surprise you. Those which will not - were never intended
to bloom regardless of what you or anyone else would have done.
Even this letter is an act of Evangelization. As we answer your
questions, questions which are shared by many, many who may not even be
aware that they have them or are unable to express them, you are
causing their illumination because, if we did not have your letter to
answer, we would not be writing this now in the Name of God.
Another side note- when Sept.11th happened I was surprised to find
myself so calm, when I usually am not so calm when I think of the
possible damnation of so many poor unfortunate people.
God gave you a concrete confirmation
of what we explained to you above.
Thank you for listening to me.
And we praise God for your progress
and the opportunity He gave us to help thousands upon thousands through
the answering of your letter.
From Jesus Christ @ Heaven - Published on October 5th, 2007 [Catholic
Day of Thanksgiving plus Simchat Torah - Rejoicing of the Law]
Remember, give not that which is holy to dogs; neither cast
ye your pearls before swine, lest perhaps they trample them under their
feet, and turning upon you, they tear you. [Matthew 7:6]
A. Yes, Lord, I remember but I
do not trust myself - I only trust You. What if I judge someone to be a
"swine" or a "dog" and I am wrong?
Knowing the reality of Gamaliel's advice:
Ye men of Israel,
take heed to yourselves what you intend to do, as touching these men.
36 For before these days rose up Gamaliel, affirming himself to be
somebody, to whom a number of men, about four hundred, joined
themselves: who was slain; and all that believed him were scattered,
and brought to nothing. 37 After this man, rose up Judas of Galilee, in
the days of the enrolling, and drew away the people after him: he also
perished; and all, even as many as consented to him, were dispersed. 38
And now, therefore, I say to you, refrain from these men, and let them
alone; for if this council or this work be of men, it will come to
nought; 39 But if it be of God, you cannot overthrow it, lest perhaps
you be found even to fight against God. [Acts 5]
I rather give them a chance just in case I erred in judgment for, if
that someone is indeed a "swine"
or a "dog", I take refuge in the truth of Gamaliel's advise and in the
fact that You promised:
....He will save me from the fowler's snare and from
the deadly pestilence. He will cover me with His feathers, and under
His wings I will find refuge; His faithfulness will be my shield and
....A thousand may fall at my side, ten thousand at my right hand, but
it will not come near me. [Psalm 91]
Lord, I do not wish to "...observe with my eyes and see the
punishment of the wicked." [Psalm
91] What I prefer is that those who may be deceived
by said "swine"
or "dog" see it in time so that they may break lose from their evil
spell before is too late.
From KH @ USA - Published on October 4th, 2007
God Bless LL in your Public
Forum 2 dated October 4th, (1)
in reference to the utilization of a statue of St. Joseph to sell
That is the most wonderful faith story I have heard in a long
time! And it prompted me to remove a similar type of "charm" that
I had placed at the "advice" of a priest.
You and LL are right, there are no results that are worth compromising
and trying to shortcut God's Path for us!!!
Thanks to your readers for being the voice of reason and a glimmer of
light in the darkness.
you for providing this feedback for LL and all the LL's in the world.
Unfortunately, not everyone feels that way when faced with the truth.
Two days ago, responding in private to a lady who has been reading the
documents inhere published and who we know in person, we stated:
We are quite familiar with "the aura
scene" and probably 20 years ago stopped paying attention to it.
This does not deny their reality, the problem is that when we "feed"
our ability of seeing anything in the supernatural domain we are
falling back to reliance on our physical senses.
Our objective should be to "fly by instruments only" - the guidance of
the Holy Spirit of God and see, with our physical eyes, nothing of the
supernatural - unless, of course, God Wills that we do see This or That.
and, to avoid a misunderstanding, we followed the above with the
While in prayer I realized that we had
not explained why we stated: "... the problem is that when we
"feed" our ability of seeing anything in the supernatural domain we are
falling back to reliance on our physical senses. Our objective should
be to "fly by instruments only" -..."
satan can mimic any information coming through our physical senses. he
cannot, however, mimic the "readings" of the Holy Spirit of God when It
has become our Guiding Light.
That is - the most convincing visual rendition staged by satan - auras
included - can be "seen" as false through our "flight by instruments
only" mechanism. This is precisely why most will fall in the
False Christ snare since the Faith of most is intellectual and not
This is exactly what He meant when He said: Jesus saith to him: Because thou hast seen me,
Thomas, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and
have believed. John 20:29
The above, under the
guise of another reason, seems to have resulted in what has to be the
most vitriolic letter we have ever received - bar none.
The silver lining of such vitriolic attack was that she confirmed what
we originally knew about the state of her soul from almost the
beginning, yet we had not physical proof of it, thus she had been given
a second chance.
(1) Public Forum No. 2
dated October 3rd (below)
From IW @ USA - Published on October 3rd, 2007
In reference to your mailing about the seemingly common practice
of burying a statue of St. Joseph in the yard to sell one's house...
We listed our home for sale on 7/4/04 and for 2 1/2 months didn't receive an offer. My wife heard of this concept regarding St. Joseph and after complying with the the protocol, the house was sold in four days.
The statue that we buried for 3-4 days, now occupies a prominent spot in our home. Trying to sell the house
was not an attempt to serve mannon, but not to have to pay costs on two homes. We were extremely glad for the help that St. Joseph gave us, if indeed that's what it was.
A. First of all, we value
your sincerity in sharing this with us since you well know that we
"talk straight" just as our Lord and Master did (1).
Secondly, when in our mailing, one read: Today's Mass reading warns us that you
cannot serve God and mammon
. it referred to the Blue Army
promoting such concept and
about the users who are just victims of what the Church,
which was originally founded by Jesus Christ, turned into (2)
. We are not
surprised - Aaron set the pace - we can read about it in Exodus 32.
Somewhere along the line the Church Administrators and those who follow
what is not of God did not get to the end of that chapter wherein we
read: And I, in the day of revenge,
will visit this sin also of theirs. The Lord therefore struck the
people for the guilt on occasion of the calf which Aaron had made.
We do not doubt that it works, just like necromancy and fortune tellers
are realities (3),
just like Pharaoh's magicians [Exodus 7:11] caused their rods to turn
into serpents, just like Simon, Elymas and Bar-jesu the magicians
mentioned in the Acts of the Apostles existed, just like the properly
made "spells" of santeria, witchcraft, voodoo, etc. work.
They work because, as we have explained elsewhere, there are ways
of getting things done resorting to methods which are known to
the initiates of the occult, however, just because they work that does
not mean that they are from God.
When we resort to what is explicitly forbidden by God to secure
anything we are, in effect, attempting to by pass God. He may allow
that transgression to teach us a lesson - for whatever is obtained
through supernatural means bypassing God has a price. Whatever
God willingly and lovingly grants to those who appeal to Him in
accordance to His Laws carries no price - it is freely given by an
infinitely Loving God.
Not only we are fully aware about all of this through Divine
Revelation, we also have enough concrete examples to fill a large book.
Therefore - when we have an isntitution/organization that people still
respect (out of ignorance) -like the Blue Army (4), promoting what is
tantamount to idolatry and advanced santeria -we have a major
problem.... but then again, those who have Eyes and Ears know that and,
blessedly, it will be taken care of soon.
To tell you otherwise, we would be lying to you and we do not even do
that to the very few individuals who have been moved by God to
financially assist in this work. To alter the truth for money is
called: Prostitution [Revelations chapters 17 and 18]
(1) Jesus Speaks Clearly
(2) Jesus Christ condemns the
Roman Church Administration
(3) About fortunetellers and necromancy
(4) The rise and fall of the Blue Army
From RC @ USA - Published on September
In reference to your mailing... (1)
Today's Gospel Reading [Luke 16: 19-31] reminds us why
most will not believe you.
The rich man did not "get it" since he was not a Child of
God. God's Children can hear Him when He calls. God's
Children are not without fault, but when the time comes, they will get
the message, if for no other reason than God insists that they do; whatever it takes, God will
get them to listen.
In the case of the rich man and his brothers, not only did he and
they ignore Moses and the prophets, but truly, they would not have
believed even if a man rose from the dead to tell them the truth.
The rich man and his brothers would insist that the risen man was
"not a face they recognized" and that that same man lived in "an
God either gives one the light or He condemns one to the
darkness. If God will not give one the Grace to see, it will not
For the Children of God, they know, not believe, that Miguel is
right. The end of Our Times is anticlimactic at this point.
We know enough to know how it ends, the details are best left to God.
Peace and Best wishes!
A. You stated:
"...whatever it takes, God will get them to
." That is indeed the case
since "Pain is the megaphone that God uses for
the deaf to hear"
and, as we have stated many times, to minimize
the suffering of the Elect (i.e. reduce "whatever it takes") is one of
our functions. The faster the slumbering Elect wake up, the less
they will suffer.
We take this opportunity to give more light to the referenced Gospel
which will underscore the fact that "If God will not give one the Grace to
see, it will not happen."
The parable in question [Lazarus and the rich man] is the only
parable where the main character has a name - Lazarus. Now, let us
highlight a specific quotation from said parable: "And he (Abraham) said to him (the dead rich
man): If they hear not Moses
and the prophets, neither will they believe, if one rise again from the
Now, let us "fast forward" to the Gospel according to John,
Chapters 11 and 12. Jesus raised a dead and already decomposing Lazarus
almost at the gates of Jerusalem. There were many witnesses and
many people were converted when they witnessed Lazarus resurrection. A
little later we see that Jesus dined with Lazarus and sisters in His
way to Jerusalem where He would be crucified in about six days.
In spite of the astonishing miracle He had performed at the gates of
Jerusalem, He was crucified because "... neither will they believe, if one rise
again from the dead."
Perfect Divine coherence in the Holy Scriptures.
Thank you for the opportunity to Glorify God.
Quote fron news report:
KADENA AIR BASE, Japan (AP) — While the U.S. has been tied up
in Iraq, China is modernizing its military and its air defenses are
now nearly impenetrable to all but the newest of American fighters, the
senior U.S. military official in Japan said.
Lt. Gen. Bruce Wright, commander of the roughly 50,000 U.S. forces
in Japan, Washington's biggest ally in Asia, said in an interview with
The Associated Press this week that the Iraq war is reducing the
availability of U.S. troops and equipment to meet other contingencies.
It's also eating funds that could go toward replacing or upgrading
planes that are being pushed to their operational limits, he said.
Just exactly as has been planned by the enemies of the US -
who lie within it and about which Mr. Bush is completely ignorant. It
is sad to see a human being - any human being - be so blatantly
manipulated and made fun of on a world wide scale.
News report: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jw3wdrz2Xcr0w6_08h5xoTucdQXwD8RV07F01
Let us continue to pray....
PS One day - when is too late - most will realize that when we
encouraged prayer as "the only thing left to do" - we were also right.
2007 - 2017 by The M+G+R
Foundation. All rights reserved. However, you may freely reproduce and
distribute this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as
to its source; (2) No changes are made in the text without prior
written consent; and (3) No charge is made for it.
Note: If the above dated image
does not appear on this document, it means that you are not viewing the
original document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to
view the original document.
you wish to contact
The M+G+R Foundation, please Click Here